I started my real estate career with a local company, who's office was in downtown Gresham...thirty years ago. Gresham had a sleepy, small downtown, a few restaurants and businesses, and some vacant storefronts. This was before the MAX light-rail, and back when G.I. Joes was still selling us our camping and sporting equipment.
These days, Gresham has a bustling downtown with plenty of shops and restaurants, including a farmer's market and brew pub. Some old favorites are still around too; M & M Cafe, and The Glass Butterfly, to name a few.
As folks have been priced out of closer in neighborhoods, Gresham, Troutdale and Fairview have caught the attention of buyers and real estate agents alike. With established neighborhoods and good housing stock, buyers are liking all that, plus larger lots, the downtown area, and better access to Mt. Hood and the Columbia River Gorge.
As some of our market is slowing a bit, as seen in lower increases in the average sale price, Gresham/Troutdale, along with a few other outlying or suburban areas, has seen a pretty good increase in the average sale price. While overall, the Portland area has seen a 1.9% increase in the average sale price in the last twelve months, Gresham/Troutdale saw 4.3%, Beaverton/Aloha 5% and Columbia County's average sale price increased 4.5% in the last twelve months.
Similarly, Gresham/Troutdale's average days on market 45, as compared to the overall Portland area's 55 days on market.
And, as you might imagine, I've just listed a great house in Gresham.
2916 NE 26th St, is a three bedroom, two and a half bath split level house on a HUGE lot. Priced at $359,950, its pretty affordable. With newer double paned vinyl windows and a high efficiency heat pump/furnace combo it stays pretty cozy. The .27 of an acre yard has room for all sort of stuff; dog run, garden beds, RV parking, sand box, hot tub hook up etc.
I'll be there for an open house on Saturday, October 26 from 1:00 - 3:00pm. Come check it out! And if you have questions about Gresham and east Multnomah County, give me a holler.
Friday, October 25, 2019
Tuesday, October 15, 2019
What's the deal with Opendoor and Zillow Offers?
These companies are referred to in the industry as ibuyers; instant buyer, internet buyer or investor buyer. They will make a cash offer on a house, site unseen. Usually, a homeowner or their agent will request an offer through a website or app. The offer is then sent to the buyer within 24-48 hours.
While their advertising touts no real estate commissions, Opendoor’s average service fee, in the Portland market has been 7.1%. Realtor’s aren’t allowed to discuss specific commission rates per the FTC, but trust me, many folks charge fees less than this. Zillow Offer’s fee is also around 7%. Once an offer is accepted, the ibuyer will have an inspection done by an employee, not a licensed, third party inspector. Similar to a “regular” transaction, repairs may be asked for and negotiated. Close dates are usually set by the seller and can be as soon as 10 days, or up to 60 days.
These quick to close, cash offers can certainly have a place in our market. While the seller may not get top dollar for their property, they can get certainty, convenience and control. You’ll know the amount of your proceeds pretty quickly, can control the close date to your needs, and don’t have to be inconvenienced by multiple showings and open houses. Have a busy family where keeping the house show ready and accommodating showings is hard? This type of transaction might work for you. Similarly, if you need to sell your home to buy your next home, working with an ibuyer can make that process easier and less stressful. Or maybe you’re relocating out of the area on short notice; an ibuyer make things quicker and easier.
If the idea of possibly leaving money on the table will drive you crazy, an ibuyer may not be for you.
A few things to know. Currently, in the Portland market, Opendoor is buying in the area from Forest Grove to Sandy, and the Columbia River to Newberg (they are not yet in Washington). They’ll only buy homes that were built in 1960 or later, priced from $150,000 - $550,000. They won’t buy anything behind a locked, shared entry; think condominium or gated community, and they won’t buy anything with a pool.
Once a sale closes, the house will be re-listed for sale through their proprietary systems. You might see Opendoor’s signs of the 24/7 open house. Buyer’s can access the house themselves, without an agent, using their app. Some have security concerns about the public going in houses unaccompanied, and worry about squatters are assault crimes . As far as I know, we haven’t had any of those issues here, but in the Phoenix market (where Opendoor has been for several years), there have been such issues.
Also to know, when Opendoor buys a property, while they do their own inspection, they usually do not test for radon, do sewer scopes nor oil tank searches. Buyers should be sure to have these inspections done as part of their purchase.
In general, the ibuyer model is meant to make money on the transaction fees (that 7% noted on the Portland market). They are not considered flipper. That is, the business model isn’t necessarily about buying low and selling high; though I’m sure they endeavor NOT to lose money on the buy/sell. Ibuyers are seen as technology companies, not real estate companies, and have LOTS of financial backing.
Lastly, in selling to Opendoor, unless you have pre-arranged to engage and pay a Realtor, you will not have your own representation. Opendoor will, understandably, be acting in their own interests. Similarly, if you choose to buy an Opendoor property directly from them, you will not have your own representation and counsel through the offer, inspection and closing process. Buyers can choose to be represented by their own agent.
Most of this piece focuses on Opendoor as Zillow Offers is quite new to our market and less information is available. Offer Pad and Redfin Now are active ibuyers in other markets, but have yet to come to the Portland area.
If you have more questions on ibuyers, I’d be glad to chat. 503-312-8038. leslievjones@gmail.com
Wednesday, October 2, 2019
Historic research in Portland
I had a listing recently, with two houses on one city lot in an older, close-in neighborhood. In the buyer's due diligence, she discovered the city did not show building permits for the two structures. Both were built somewhere between 1895 and 1900, so its not surprising that records might be sketchy. And, it can be tricky to attach building permits for two address to one property.
This was a concern to the buyer as she would be rehabbing these old houses, and would need permits. If the city didn't recognize the existence of the houses, she would be unable to pull permits for her work. The Bureau of Development Services did say, if we could prove the houses existed prior to 1928 (when certain zoning and building regulations were codified), we could go through a process to, in a sense, grandfather the houses in. They provided a list of acceptable evidence:
Utility bills
Income tax records
Business license
Listings in telephone, business or Polk directories
Advertisements in dated publications
Building, land use or development permits
Insurance polices
Leases
Dated aerial photos
Insurance maps that identify use or development (Sanborn maps)
Land use and development inventories prepared by a government agency.
Mind you, the zoning allows two houses, so the issue was not about zoning. And the seller had been paying taxes on two houses. The issue was whether or not these particular houses were allowed to exist.
As the buyer had already been unable to find the permits at the Bureau of Development Services, I knew we had to look elsewhere. I plotted a whole day, if necessary, to this project, and set off for downtown; City of Portland Archives and the Oregon Historical Society were to be my first two stops.
Basing my starting point on which office closed sooner than the others, I started at the City of Portland Archives, located at 1800 SW 6th Ave #550 . I read their policies; no pens, be prepared to put your purse or bag in a locker, no flash for photos, no food or drink. I found my way to the 5th floor office atop a Portland State University building and was greeted by a locked door. I was let in by a staff member and then buzzed in to the public room; imagine a small library room, with glass windows looking in on the actual archives. The staff person was super welcoming, helped me get signed in and to stash my bag in a locker.
The staff person who helped me was so helpful, and enthusiastic about her job. As I described what I was looking for she thought of the various ways we could get at the data. We ended up finding a variety of data to show they houses both existed prior to 1928. We found a card catalogue index card of permits for both houses, dated appropriately. The Multnomah County Library has, on line old maps, which the archivist accessed for me.
There are beautiful old books of hand drawn maps for each tiny section of a neighbourhood. In these, I found the name of the owner of the subject properties, with which we could then cross reference. And remember, many of Portland's streets are renamed when the cities of Portland and East Portland were combined. Luckily, I new the historic name of the street on which the properties are located. Looking at the old maps can be disorienting; SE Powell wasn't very big. and dead ended in the Brooklyn neighborhood because...no Ross Island Bridge ( it opened in 1926).
From here, there is a process whereby we submit they evidence I found (in the city's own archives), and pay a $1100ish fee for the city to review their own documents and "approve" the two houses. As part of our negotiations with the buyer, the seller will do this before closing. Mind you, I'm thankful for the archives and how extremely helpful the staff there were. I am a bit perplexed at paying a fee for the city to look at their documents I rounded up, so they can, in a sense, correct their own error. The alternative would have been a huge reduction in the sale price, or losing that buyer.
If you've been in a similar position, or have run into road blocks on property information, remember, the Bureau of Development Services has incomplete files, and portlandmaps.com, while super helpful and convenient, has limited historic information.
I'm not an expert (at all) on property research, but if you have questions, I'm glad to help.
This was a concern to the buyer as she would be rehabbing these old houses, and would need permits. If the city didn't recognize the existence of the houses, she would be unable to pull permits for her work. The Bureau of Development Services did say, if we could prove the houses existed prior to 1928 (when certain zoning and building regulations were codified), we could go through a process to, in a sense, grandfather the houses in. They provided a list of acceptable evidence:
Utility bills
Income tax records
Business license
Listings in telephone, business or Polk directories
Advertisements in dated publications
Building, land use or development permits
Insurance polices
Leases
Dated aerial photos
Insurance maps that identify use or development (Sanborn maps)
Land use and development inventories prepared by a government agency.
Mind you, the zoning allows two houses, so the issue was not about zoning. And the seller had been paying taxes on two houses. The issue was whether or not these particular houses were allowed to exist.
As the buyer had already been unable to find the permits at the Bureau of Development Services, I knew we had to look elsewhere. I plotted a whole day, if necessary, to this project, and set off for downtown; City of Portland Archives and the Oregon Historical Society were to be my first two stops.
Basing my starting point on which office closed sooner than the others, I started at the City of Portland Archives, located at 1800 SW 6th Ave #550 . I read their policies; no pens, be prepared to put your purse or bag in a locker, no flash for photos, no food or drink. I found my way to the 5th floor office atop a Portland State University building and was greeted by a locked door. I was let in by a staff member and then buzzed in to the public room; imagine a small library room, with glass windows looking in on the actual archives. The staff person was super welcoming, helped me get signed in and to stash my bag in a locker.
The staff person who helped me was so helpful, and enthusiastic about her job. As I described what I was looking for she thought of the various ways we could get at the data. We ended up finding a variety of data to show they houses both existed prior to 1928. We found a card catalogue index card of permits for both houses, dated appropriately. The Multnomah County Library has, on line old maps, which the archivist accessed for me.
There are beautiful old books of hand drawn maps for each tiny section of a neighbourhood. In these, I found the name of the owner of the subject properties, with which we could then cross reference. And remember, many of Portland's streets are renamed when the cities of Portland and East Portland were combined. Luckily, I new the historic name of the street on which the properties are located. Looking at the old maps can be disorienting; SE Powell wasn't very big. and dead ended in the Brooklyn neighborhood because...no Ross Island Bridge ( it opened in 1926).
From here, there is a process whereby we submit they evidence I found (in the city's own archives), and pay a $1100ish fee for the city to review their own documents and "approve" the two houses. As part of our negotiations with the buyer, the seller will do this before closing. Mind you, I'm thankful for the archives and how extremely helpful the staff there were. I am a bit perplexed at paying a fee for the city to look at their documents I rounded up, so they can, in a sense, correct their own error. The alternative would have been a huge reduction in the sale price, or losing that buyer.
If you've been in a similar position, or have run into road blocks on property information, remember, the Bureau of Development Services has incomplete files, and portlandmaps.com, while super helpful and convenient, has limited historic information.
I'm not an expert (at all) on property research, but if you have questions, I'm glad to help.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)